Join the Friends of WALLY at the Howell Farmers Markets. There will be information about WALLY and locally grown food. Downtown Howell, Sunday July 17 form 9am to 2pm. Here is a link about the event.
Join the Friends of WALLY at the Howell Farmers Markets. There will be information about WALLY and locally grown food. Downtown Howell, Sunday July 17 form 9am to 2pm. Here is a link about the event.
Stop by the Friends of WALLY booth at the Hamburg Family Fun Fest. It is Thursday thru Saturday, June 16 – 18. Gates open at 12 noon and booths close at 7 pm. With shows and fireworks form 7pm to 10pm. Address is 10411 Merrill Rd in Whitmore Lake. Here is a link for more information.
Looking for something to do this weekend? Join the Friends of WALLY at the 16th Annual Ann Arbor Green Fair and Marion Township Heritage Days both this weekend. The Ann Arbor Green fair is downtown Ann Arbor on Friday June 10 from 6pm to 9pm. Here is their link with more information. The Marion Township Heritage Days is Saturday and Sunday June 11 and 12 from 9am to 4pm at Marion Township Complex at 2877 W Coon Lake Road. Here is a link with for more information. Our volunteers would be happy to answer questions about WALLY or any other questions about public transportation.
The Livingston County Transportation Coalition published the following plan to improve the county’s transportation system.
Continue reading A Vision for Transportation for Livingston County
Dear Friends of WALLY,
Your Friends of WALLY Outreach Committee have come up with some great opportunities to spread the word to folks all around Livingston County about the advantages of the proposed commuter rail line between Howell and Ann Arbor, with intermediate stops in Genoa Township, Hamburg and Whitmore Lake. You already know at least some of the benefits of Wally to our county. Please help get the word to out to our friends and neighbors.
We are asking each member to volunteer two hours of your time this season to help staff a table at one of the events on the attached list. All you have to do is show up at the designated time, greet people with a smile and hand out literature. We will team you with a more experienced volunteer who can handle questions you feel you can’t answer. We think you will find your time enjoyable, rewarding and well spent.
Please e-mail Hugh Gurney at hgurney@hsmichigan.org with the event, date and time slot you can fill. While we are asking everyone to contribute two hours of your time, we welcome your participation at multiple events for up to four hours at a time.
If you know of other events at which you think we should be present, please let us know.
Thanks so much for helping make Wally a reality and not just a dream.
Your Outreach Committee,
Friends of WALLY
Join us at the next Friends of WALLY meeting. At the meeting we will be mapping out our plans the coming year. If you have ideas, we could use them. The meeting will be at the Howell Carnegie District Library form 1pm to 3pm on Saturday April 2, 2016. In the Conference room which is back of the library on Clinton Street. The address of the library is 314 W Grand River Ave, Howell, MI 48843.
Those who are unable to attend we will set-up a phone conferencing for the meeting. If you want phone conferencing please let me know. My email is friendsofwally@gmail.com and phone number of 517-896-5275.
Below is an update of the North South Commuter Rail or WALLY Study just published.
Hello followers of the North-South Commuter Rail Study!
Over the past two months, the project team has been evaluating data and planning the next steps of the study. To date our efforts have focused on services that run train sets into Ann Arbor in the morning and back out to various destinations in the evening during the peak travel hours. We have been evaluating preliminary capital and operating cost estimates, ridership forecasts, and potential station locations. We have been collaborating with the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) and the Washtenaw Area Transportation Study (WATS) to ensure this data is consistent with regional transportation planning models. During the coming months we will continue to make refinements to our work.
The majority of our effort to date has focused on previously identified options that range in the level of service. In the next few months will focus on exploring some additional options that could provide commuter rail service in this corridor. We anticipate some of the new options may be ruled out quickly while others will go through a level of analysis similar to initial options. We look forward to continuing our work in 2016 and sharing findings with you in the Spring.
The following is an article by Larry Krieg, PhD.
Imagine the following scenario: It’s 2020 and Avery has just purchased her first home in Whitmore Lake. Avery wanted to buy in the City of Ann Arbor, but graduate school debt combined with Ann Arbor’s prohibitively expensive housing market made it impossible for her to settle in her hometown. Although Avery looked at a number of other bedroom communities such as Manchester, Saline, and Salem, she loved the idea of taking a train to work each morning, and Whitmore Lake was one of the only communities that offered commuter transit. During Avery’s Junior Year of college she studied abroad in Germany and lived in a suburb of Berlin, taking the S-bahn into the City each morning. Avery loved the extra time she gained by riding the train and maximized it by doing homework or catching up with friends on social media. Now a new homeowner, Avery can’t wait to start riding WALLY to work each day, and hopes that it will be as efficient as the S-bahn she relied on when she studied abroad in Germany.
Much like our fictional Avery, I also had an opportunity to ride the S-bahn. In May 2014 I visited Germany with the purpose of maximizing my exposure to their efficient public transit systems. Without the use of a car I comfortably traveled within and between Munich, Berlin, and Rostock. In Germany, most public rail transit is categorized as either U-bahn, S-bahn, Regional Service, or Intercity Service. I was fortunate to experience each tier of service during my trip. In Berlin and Munich I rode on the U-bahn which provided rapid transit service within the city, and in Berlin and Rostock I rode the S-bahn which provided rapid transit service between the city and its suburbs. I also took a Regional Service train between Berlin and Rostock, and took an Intercity train between Berlin and Munich.
The proposed WALLY line would function most like Germany’s S-bahn system, connecting the suburbs to a main city and economic hub. “S-bahn” is short for “Stadtschnellbahn” which means “city rapid railway”, and was first introduced in its modern form in Berlin in 1930. Prior to 1930, sections of the S-bahn existed, but were powered by steam locomotive until 1926 when electrification of the lines occurred. The component of Berlin’s S-bahn system that I was best acquainted with is called the Berlin Ringbahn which forms a double-tracked ring around the city center. However, the S-bahn system I rode that most closely resembles the proposed WALLY line is Rostock’s S-bahn.
Rostock is located approximately 150 miles north of Berlin, has a population of 203,431, and a density of 2,904 people per square mile. The city is famous for having one of the oldest universities in the world, the University of Rostock, founded in 1419, and its economy is based in maritime industries, biomedical high-tech, education, and tourism. Let’s take a minute to compare it with Ann Arbor… Ann Arbor has an estimated population of 117,770, and a density of 4,103 people per square mile. Ann Arbor is famous for the University of Michigan, the oldest university in Michigan, founded in 1817. Ann Arbor’s economy is based on education and biomedical high-tech. Although Ann Arbor’s population is a little more than half the size of Rostock’s, it is also twice as dense which improves the operating efficiency of public transit. Rostock’s S-bahn system has three lines, 26 stations, and spans 56 miles. By comparison, WALLY would have one line, seven stations, and would span approximately 40 miles, terminating in the City of Howell which has an estimated population of 9,505.
During my stay, I primarily used Rostock’s S-bahn to travel between the Parkstrasse Station in the City of Rostock and Warnemunde, a suburban Baltic Sea resort of fish restaurants and quaint cottages with a population of 8,441 people. I never had to wait long for the train, since it came every 15 minutes. On the train, I once found myself sitting next to a middle-aged commuter dressed in a business suit reading a newspaper, and later next to a group of three college friends hoisting duffel bags filled with camping supplies. I also observed what appeared to be a group of middle schoolers on some sort of class excursion, and various families trying to keep young children entertained. The train cars themselves were very clean, upholstered in bright blue, and equipped with real-time intelligent transportation system (ITS) technology that showed arrival and departure times for S-bahn stops. Although relatively full, the cars were not over-crowded, and there were popular in-car storage spaces for bicycles. I was privileged to ride on Rostock’s brand-new electric Bombardier Talent 2 train cars which were completely phased in by 2014. Prior to this Rostock used push-pull trains with double-decker cars.
I’m not delusional enough to think that WALLY’s headways, coverage, rolling stock, or multi-modal integration will be comparable to what I experienced on Rostock’s exemplary S-bahn system. However, Rostock’s system shows us that a suburban commuter train can be extremely viable given the Ann Arbor region’s population, density, and economy, if only we can find the political and financial capital to implement it. And when that happens, our region will be able to retain more talented young people like our fictional heroine Avery
This post originally appeared on Michigan Environmental Council’s website here.
The Coast-to-Coast Passenger Rail Ridership and Cost Estimate Study is complete—marking the first milestone toward re-establishing passenger rail service between Michigan’s major cities of Detroit, Lansing and Grand Rapids. This exploratory study provides a working understanding of the ridership potential and costs associated with operating passenger rail service.
Key findings:
For years, Michigan Environmental Council (MEC) has been a major proponent expanding passenger rail options in Michigan. From leading a major public engagement effort to gather feedback on the Michigan State Rail Plan in 2010, to co-founding Michigan By Rail, a statewide coalition with the goal to expand passenger rail options in the state, MEC advocates for improved and expanded passenger rail options to protect the environment and enhance economic prosperity in communities across the state.
The 2011 Michigan State Rail Plan includes recommendations for studying service between Detroit, Lansing and Grand Rapids, which was discontinued in 1971. Through a partnership between the Michigan Department of Transportation, the Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority and the Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, MEC took the lead on the first step of service development by initiating and managing this study.
Interested? Download the report below and sign-on to our list of supporters to receive updates and information about how to get involved.